From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: cost per transaction |
Date: | 2007-04-20 16:18:45 |
Message-ID: | 36e682920704200918n737a0d45m494a51d32b65fa49@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 4/20/07, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
> The last time I looked at TP$ benchmarks, they counted the cost of
> both software and hardware when accounting for costs.
Yes, you are correct.
> The fact that PostgreSQL may have no licensing fees might imply that
> the *software* cost per transaction is $0. But the hardware still has
> some cost, so you will have to count that...
Yes, I forgot to mention the hardware cost as well.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2007-04-21 07:56:13 | Start-Up of the European Group |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2007-04-20 15:10:51 | Re: cost per transaction |