Re: cost per transaction

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: cost per transaction
Date: 2007-04-20 16:18:45
Message-ID: 36e682920704200918n737a0d45m494a51d32b65fa49@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 4/20/07, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
> The last time I looked at TP$ benchmarks, they counted the cost of
> both software and hardware when accounting for costs.

Yes, you are correct.

> The fact that PostgreSQL may have no licensing fees might imply that
> the *software* cost per transaction is $0. But the hardware still has
> some cost, so you will have to count that...

Yes, I forgot to mention the hardware cost as well.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriele Bartolini 2007-04-21 07:56:13 Start-Up of the European Group
Previous Message Chris Browne 2007-04-20 15:10:51 Re: cost per transaction