Re: Proposal for Implenting read-only queries during wal replay (SoC 2007)

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for Implenting read-only queries during wal replay (SoC 2007)
Date: 2007-02-26 21:05:07
Message-ID: 36e682920702261305i5ea1826cx6d00b195b50fe7ad@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/26/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Jonah, I have no idea what "fault" you are trying to blame on the
> community in the above statement. The author didn't discuss the idea
> with the community before spending months on it so we have no obligation
> to accept it in the core.

You're missing the point entirely. The majority of the (vocal)
community didn't even want the feature and as such, failed to provide
viable suggestions for him to move forward. As the majority of the
community didn't want the feature, it wouldn't have made a difference
when he proposed it; which would have remained negative nonetheless.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-02-26 21:11:39 Seeking Google SoC Mentors
Previous Message Robert Treat 2007-02-26 20:50:04 Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question