| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Mario Weilguni" <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME column |
| Date: | 2006-11-17 15:48:33 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920611170748m4116c876rb1a050a0beea4262@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/17/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> No, it should not, because that risks breaking other references to the
> sequence (eg, in user-written functions). If the user is feeling that
> he wants consistency, he can rename the sequence himself and take
> responsibility for any side-effects on his code.
I concur.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-17 16:39:19 | Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-17 15:37:35 | Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME column |