Re: Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib

On 8/27/06, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> 1. Is not quite complete

Only because it wasn't merged into the core. Which, like I said,
would be difficult to get consensus on design, grammar, and
implementation when it's a brand new and non-standard feature only a
few people understand. I honestly don't think a project like that
would've ever gotten off the ground in -hackers. Being a contrib
module makes it a bit more flexible and gives people the chance to try
it out; that way we'll see if it's worth merging into the core. Think
of it as a Phase I of Full DIsjunctions... Phase II is a bit of a
redesign and merge into 8.3.

> 2. Does not follow postgresql style guidelines

This statement was not made.

> I believe those two points were made by Tom but I can't find his
> response so if I am on crack -- I apologize in advance.

One of the points, taken a little out of context, was made by Tom.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/