Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Chahine Hamila" <chahine(dot)hamila(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Subject: Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql
Date: 2006-08-27 04:59:11
Message-ID: 36e682920608262159m7da6b074ld5c26f176f13f2e7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/27/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> My take on all this is that there's no one-size-fits-all replication
> solution, and therefore the right approach is to have multiple active
> subprojects.

Can't help but agree there. Maybe someday the subprojects will get
together and come up with a standard framework each of them could
use... but PGCluster, as good as it is, certainly doesn't address much
of the replication arena; primarily asynchronous replication for both
multimaster and master-slave.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-27 05:38:32 Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-27 04:48:06 jabber.postgresql.org is up