Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our
Date: 2005-11-15 06:28:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackers
I agree.
 (sorry again Tom... dang GMAIL should default reply to all.... grrrr!)
 On 11/14/05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There's something in what you say. We'd have to rename pg_clog as well,
> >> since that's even more critical than pg_xlog ...
> > Rename them to pg_donttouchthis and pg_youneedthis.
> :-)
> On a more serious level: Tim's suggestion of "pg_wal" for pg_xlog sounds
> fine to me. How about "pg_trans" for pg_clog, by analogy to the
> existing pg_subtrans? Nothing else in the standard layout looks like
> it's got a name that a newbie would think means discardable data.
> regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2005-11-15 06:38:31
Previous:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2005-11-15 06:27:23
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: sandhyaDate: 2005-11-15 11:52:16
Subject: Reg: Changing Column type
Previous:From: ITS ONT Alcazar, Jose Aguedo CDate: 2005-11-15 05:53:27
Subject: Re: Major Problem, need help! Can't run our website!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group