Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our

I agree.
(sorry again Tom... dang GMAIL should default reply to all.... grrrr!)
On 11/14/05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There's something in what you say. We'd have to rename pg_clog as well,
> >> since that's even more critical than pg_xlog ...
>
> > Rename them to pg_donttouchthis and pg_youneedthis.
>
> :-)
>
> On a more serious level: Tim's suggestion of "pg_wal" for pg_xlog sounds
> fine to me. How about "pg_trans" for pg_clog, by analogy to the
> existing pg_subtrans? Nothing else in the standard layout looks like
> it's got a name that a newbie would think means discardable data.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>