Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....)

From: Clark Evans <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, rbrad(at)hpb50023(dot)boi(dot)hp(dot)com
Subject: Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....)
Date: 1999-03-17 23:49:09
Message-ID: 36F03F75.F63446A4@manhattanproject.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It would only mark the the column as an OID that is used for Serial.
> The same thing with large objects, so it is an oid, and used for large
> objects. It allows pg_dump and other programs to understand the use of
> the oid.

So, the serial column and the OID column would be one and
the same? Why is there a sequence problem then?

Clark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-17 23:49:43 Re: OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....)
Previous Message Clark Evans 1999-03-17 23:43:30 OID vs SERIAL? (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Sequences....)