Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire)

From: Clark Evans <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire)
Date: 1999-03-16 22:45:22
Message-ID: 36EEDF02.B9E187E7@manhattanproject.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote:
> And wouldn't require a dump/reload.

Ooh. If you change pg_operators and add a column. Ok.
For the new version, don't they have to do this anyway?

Clark

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-16 22:50:45 Subqueries and indexes
Previous Message Clark Evans 1999-03-16 22:42:04 Re: [HACKERS] Associative Operators? (Was: Re: [NOVICE] Out of frying pan, into fire)