Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: Stupor Genius <stuporg(at)erols(dot)com>, Pgsql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit
Date: 1999-02-18 03:17:01
Message-ID: 36CB862D.22FCF6FA@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> But modern Unixes have read/write ahead i/o if it seems a sequential
> access, don't they. I did some testing on my LinuxPPC box.
>
> 0. create table t2(i int,c char(4000));
> 1. time psql -c "copy t2 from '/tmp/aaa'" test
> (aaa has 5120 records and this will create 20MB table)
> 2. time psql -c "select count(*) from t2" test
> 3. total time of the regression test
>
> o result of testing 1
>
> 8K: 0.02user 0.04system 3:26.20elapsed
> 32K: 0.03user 0.06system 0:48.25elapsed
>
> 32K is 4 times faster than 8k!
>
> o result of testing 2
>
> 8K: 0.02user 0.04system 6:00.31elapsed
> 32K: 0.04user 0.02system 1:02.13elapsed
>
> 32K is neary 6 times faster than 8k!

Did you use the same -B for 8K and 32K ?
You should use 4x buffers in 8K case!

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-02-18 03:24:14 Re: [HACKERS] What does this mean?
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-02-18 03:16:57 Re: [HACKERS] varchar function