Re: [HACKERS] Is the int8_ops being implimented?

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Ryan Bradetich <rbrad(at)hpb50023(dot)boi(dot)hp(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Is the int8_ops being implimented?
Date: 1999-02-17 15:32:04
Message-ID: 36CAE0F4.5B8A2015@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> ryan=> create table test (test int8 PRIMARY KEY);
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index test_pkey for table test
> ERROR: Can't find a default operator class for type 20.
> Doesn't look quite right to me. If no-one else is working on this,
> maybe this would be a good project for me to look into.

Sure, go ahead. If you run into trouble or want suggestions, let me know
since I have this on my ToDo list anyway...

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter T Mount 1999-02-17 15:45:58 Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit
Previous Message Horak Daniel 1999-02-17 14:19:25 interface between backend and dynamicly loaded modules