Re: Missing docs on AT TIME ZONE precedence?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing docs on AT TIME ZONE precedence?
Date: 2023-11-26 20:11:19
Message-ID: 3698134.1701029479@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Comparing the precedence list in the grammar with the doc table,
> the only omissions I feel bad about are AT and COLLATE.

Concretely, as attached.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
doc-AT-COLLATE-precedence.patch text/x-diff 1.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2023-11-26 20:11:59 Re: Improve rowcount estimate for UNNEST(column)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2023-11-26 18:19:19 Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15