Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking
Date: 2004-06-14 16:39:08
Message-ID: 3698.1087231148@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

> Right, we can just close the pipe. I was thinking of adding another
> signal but that's obviously easier. Will work on making this happen.

... except there is no postmaster pipe anymore --- back to plan A.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gary Doades 2004-06-14 17:59:34 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Compiling libpq with VisualC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-06-14 16:27:02 Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking