| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, "'pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fork/exec patch |
| Date: | 2003-12-14 23:53:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3694.1071446002@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I don't think we ever discussed it, but it seemed logical and a minimal
> change to the code. We already have a GUC write of non-default values
> for exec and no one had issues with that.
You can hardly claim that "no one had issues with that". I complained
about it and I think other people did too. It's a messy, ugly approach;
moreover we have no field experience that says it's reliable.
It may be the least messy, ugly approach available, but I concur with
Neil's wish to at least look for other answers.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-14 23:57:31 | Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-14 23:45:01 | Re: Walker/mutator prototype. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-14 23:57:31 | Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-14 23:43:54 | Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-12-15 00:02:31 | Re: fork/exec patch |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-14 23:43:54 | Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |