From: | Goran Thyni <goran(at)kirra(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) |
Date: | 1999-01-01 23:33:53 |
Message-ID: | 368D5B61.A0E1E671@kirra.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > XML is a buzzword, but it has enormous potential,
> > and it is not foreign to the pgsql community since
> > we are already using the father of XML (SGML) for
> > the docs.
> >
> > Suggestion:
> > CORBA and XML should replace current FE/BE-protocol for v. 7.0
> > Comments?
>
> I vote against it. Maybe nice to have as an extra, but the base
> protocol seems to work well, and is fast.
You are right,
let me rephrase myself:
- the "base protocol" might become obsolite if and when we have
a better object base alternative (CORBA and/or XML).
- this might be the case for v. 7.0 or later.
This is an idea for a game plan:
1. Make a proxy server
2. Integrate it in postmaster when stable (code-wise and protocol-wise)
3. Add closer integration with DB-objects
This game plan would perhaps work to get CORBA of the ground too,
there might even be sensible to make a common CORBA/XML-proxy.
I will look in to this, but will be working out of town for 2 months
(mainly feb-mars) so I will not promise anything for 6.5.
Any help or input (right now comment on the DTD etc) welcome.
regards,
--
-----------------
Göran Thyni
This is Penguin Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT
reboot!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Goran Thyni | 1999-01-01 23:43:26 | XML-Data |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-01 20:44:06 | Re: XML (was: 2 patches) |