Re: Two Flyers

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two Flyers
Date: 2004-07-07 01:05:56
Message-ID: 367d6aaecb123c5c11b8f281c5880fac@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Since I made up the flyers and Varlena, llc is paying for the
> copies of both flyers for Oscon, I get to choose the elephant
> I like best.
>
> Anyone else is welcome and encouraged to create and print
> their own flyer.

This is a strange attitude to take when earlier you said:

> Unless people *hate* them, links to these flyers should
> be created from *somewhere* on postgresql.org, presumably
> the advocacy page, but who knows where would be more
> helpful.

...which would assume that these are meant to be taken as
official community-sanctioned flyers, regardless of who is
paying for them.

While the synergy between the community (e.g. pgsql-advocacy) and
a commercial company (Varlena LLC) can benefit both parties, there
is clearly a delicate balance that must be struck. In this case,
I agree with Marc - if you are going to print out and distribute
flyers at the PostgreSQL booth at OSCON, and have asked the community
to not only proofread but make a prominent link to the flyers, then
the community certainly has a right to ask that you put the correct
logo on them. If these flyers are meant to be the exclusive property
of your company, please let us know up front, so that the community
can produce its own non-branded flyer. If you want to sponsor the
flyer by having a prominent link to Varlena LLC on the bottom, that's
great, but the final determination of the actual content should belong
to the community.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFA60zuvJuQZxSWSsgRAvxHAKCCxCIAvb0Q99qNvfX0U8HgxckzHQCeP3a1
IeXptw847eMJ/a9anZ3o3ZM=
=BK/I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-07-07 19:11:56 Re: Major PG news article
Previous Message David Fetter 2004-07-06 17:34:23 Test--please ignore