Re: Cleanup: remove unused fields from nodes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cleanup: remove unused fields from nodes
Date: 2024-04-24 12:31:57
Message-ID: 3675202.1713961917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:03:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hah. Seems like the comment for isall needs to explain that it
>> exists for this purpose, so we don't make this mistake again.

> How about something like the attached?

I was thinking about wording like

* True if DEALLOCATE ALL. This is redundant with "name == NULL",
* but we make it a separate field so that exactly this condition
* (and not the precise name) will be accounted for in query jumbling.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-04-24 12:35:37 Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-24 12:27:13 Re: Why does pgindent's README say to download typedefs.list from the buildfarm?