Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense:

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Does this make sense:
Date: 1998-12-14 07:29:51
Message-ID: 3674BE6F.5042B3D5@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Why the check for '!ipfnam'? Seems useless since we are setting it to
> NULL the line before...no?

Does a static char get initialized each time through, or just once at
allocation? Is this setting a "persistant value" for pfnam? I would
guess so, but ymmv...

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Constantin Teodorescu 1998-12-14 07:34:48 Re: [INTERFACES] RE: [HACKERS] libpq and libpgtcl in Windows
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-12-14 07:17:38 Re: [HACKERS] catalog/heap.c...