Re: Insert/select union bug

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Peter <peter(at)greatnowhere(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Insert/select union bug
Date: 2006-09-27 11:55:29
Message-ID: 367229F1-E589-4386-890F-5C3F84008709@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Sep 27, 2006, at 20:39 , Peter wrote:

>> Using COPY avoids this issue ofcourse, because there's a direct
>> link to the table. Similarly, as of 8.2 it will be possible to do:
>> INSERT INTO table (blah) VALUES (x,y,a),(f,d,g),(s,f,g), etc...
>> Which will also avoid the issue.
> COPY wont work... my list of columns for insert is also dynamically
> built and will never cover all fields in table.

How about doing the two-step? Create a temp table with the columns
you're going to load, COPY into the temp table, and do a INSERT INTO
table (...) SELECT ... FROM temp_table?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-09-27 12:23:39 Re: Insert/select union bug
Previous Message Peter 2006-09-27 11:39:13 Re: Insert/select union bug