Re: Explaining functions.

From: "Hartman, Matthew" <Matthew(dot)Hartman(at)krcc(dot)on(dot)ca>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explaining functions.
Date: 2009-06-23 13:48:14
Message-ID: 366642367C5B354197A1E0D27BC175BD0225976C@KGHMAIL.KGH.ON.CA
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Heeeey the raise notice is a good idea, thanks. I use raise notice
already for other uses, may as well go with it. Thanks.

Matthew Hartman
Programmer/Analyst
Information Management, ICP
Kingston General Hospital
(613) 549-6666 x4294

-----Original Message-----
From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:20 AM
To: Hartman, Matthew
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Explaining functions.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Hartman,
Matthew<Matthew(dot)Hartman(at)krcc(dot)on(dot)ca> wrote:
> Is there a recommended approach when trying to use EXPLAIN on a
> function? Specifically, a function that is more than the typical
SELECT
> statement or tiny loop. The one in question that I'm hoping to
optimize
> is around 250 lines.

What I normally do for benchmarking of complex functions is to
sprinkle the source with "raise notice '%', timeofday();" to figure
out where the bottlenecks are. Following that, I micro-optimize
problem queries or expressions outside of the function body in psql.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jack Orenstein 2009-06-23 13:54:32 Re: Slight change in query leads to unexpected change in query plan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-23 13:47:07 Re: Information about columns