Re: [PATCH] Add min() and max() aggregate functions for xid8

From: Ken Kato <katouknl(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add min() and max() aggregate functions for xid8
Date: 2022-02-08 09:43:18
Message-ID: 366448a09d8c2265f5f85d4363e0512c@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-02-08 15:34, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Thanks for updating the patch! It basically looks good to me. I
> applied the following small changes to the patch. Updated version of
> the patch attached. Could you review this version?

Thank you for the patch!

It looks good to me!

I'm not sure how strict coding conventions are, but the following line
is over 80 characters.
+insert into xid8_t1 values ('0'), ('010'), ('42'),
('0xffffffffffffffff'), ('-1');
Therefore, I made a patch which removed ('010') just to fit in 80
characters.

Best wishes,

--
Ken Kato
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachment Content-Type Size
min_max_aggregates_for_xid8_v5.patch text/x-diff 6.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-02-08 09:51:19 Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication
Previous Message kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com 2022-02-08 09:18:28 RE: Logical replication timeout problem