Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2022-08-04 22:05:25
Message-ID: 3664321.1659650725@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Yea. I think at the very least we need to start holding interrupts before the
> DropDatabaseBuffers() and do so until commit. That's probably best done by
> doing the transaction commit inside dropdb.

We've talked before about ignoring interrupts across commit, but
I find the idea a bit scary. In any case, DROP DATABASE is far
from the only place with a problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-08-04 22:15:51 Re: optimize lookups in snapshot [sub]xip arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-04 22:02:50 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints