Re: [HACKERS] Open the flood gates...v6.4 is tag'd...

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: darcy(at)druid(dot)net
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open the flood gates...v6.4 is tag'd...
Date: 1998-11-05 06:20:58
Message-ID: 364143CA.373AA9E@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> So do I send in my patch or have we decided to fix the null arg
> problem in the function dispatcher?

I deleted one or a few messages from this thread, but at least one
message which I still have (kept them once I realized this issue was
blowing up) mentions:

>> OK, there are more problems. If you apply the following patch to
>> the regression tests you will crash the backend in a number of
>> places.

but there was no patch enclosed or following.

Anyway, I would suggest that, until we plan out what new behaviors we
really want in the system that we don't submit a patch which breaks many
of the data types. That kind of change should, imho, be done offline and
committed as an integrated solution. If you'd like, I'd be happy to
trade patches with you as we work out the issues and once we (and anyone
else with an interest) are happy with the new behavior and have
regression tests which pass then we should commit to the tree.

As you mentioned, the date and time functions check for null inputs and
behave pretty well, and an interim solution might include using similar
techniques on the inet/cidr types.

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 1998-11-05 09:32:32 Re: [HACKERS] problem with latest snapshot
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-11-05 04:33:03 Re: [ANNOUNCE] November 4th, 1998: PostgreSQL v6.4 Released