Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Date: 1998-10-29 18:20:10
Message-ID: 3638B1DA.9C1A363F@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> points to a nonexistent operator --- there is no oid8ne in pg_proc,
> nor in the code... anyone feel like fixing it?

You de man! I just committed inet regression test fixes and resolved the
"@" operator problem. I'm back to working on docs for now...

- Tom

actually, at the moment I'm back to going to work :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-10-29 18:23:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-10-29 18:17:59 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items