| From: | bt22nakamorit <bt22nakamorit(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Make ON_ERROR_STOP stop on shell script failure |
| Date: | 2022-09-29 02:29:40 |
| Message-ID: | 36360350378935c823a9dbbff5b2e54e@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2022-09-28 21:49 に torikoshia さんは書きました:
>> if (result == 127 || result == -1)
>> {
>> pg_log_error("\\!: failed");
>> return false;
>> }
>> else if (result != 0) {
>> pg_log_error("command failed");
>> return false;
>
> Since it would be hard to understand the cause of failures from these
> two messages, it might be better to clarify them in the messages.
>
> The former comes from failures of child process creation or execution
> on it and the latter occurs when child process creation and execution
> succeeded but the return code is not 0, doesn't it?
>
>
> I also felt it'd be natural that the latter message also begins with
> "\\!" since both message concerns with \!.
>
> How do you think?
Thank you for the feedback!
I agree that the messages should be more clear.
\\!: command was not executed
\\!: command failed
Would these two messages be enough to describe the two cases?
Tatsu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-09-29 02:40:38 | Re: identifying the backend that owns a temporary schema |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-09-29 02:14:11 | Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why |