Re: [HACKERS] datetime regression test fails at daylight savings transitions

> Hmm. This offers a potential solution, then. I propose that "day"
> ought to be considered a qualitative time interval, and that
> 'now'::datetime + '1 day'::timespan
> need not yield the same thing as
> 'now'::datetime + '24 hours'::timespan
> Changing things in that way might be infeasible because of backwards
> compatibility constraints, but I think this is what the natural
> interpretation would be. (Clearly it's what the writer of the
> datetime regression test was expecting...)

Well, no I wasn't expecting that really :)

I just wanted to be sure to test 'yesterday' and 'tomorrow' behavior,
and didn't want to omit those tests just because they might fail for ~1%
of the year.

Making 'day' a qualitative time is probably possible, just chewing up
another 4 bytes of storage (for 16 bytes rather than 12). But we'll have
to think it through to make sure there aren't other side effects or
other no-so-expected behavior under other conditions.

- Tom