Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol
Date: 2020-10-14 21:10:30
Message-ID: 3633384.1602709830@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Patch attached. I would like to backpatch this to all supported
> versions so we are consistent and people don't think different PG
> versions use different return values for this. Is that safe? Looking
> at the uses of this in our code, it seems so. We aren't doing BYTEA
> escaping or TEXT encoding conversion in any of these cases.

I do not think a back-patch is a good idea. Yeah, it probably
won't break anything, but by the same token it won't fix anything.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-10-14 21:37:06 Failures during FATAL exit
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-10-14 20:46:59 Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol