| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dynamic result sets from procedures |
| Date: | 2017-11-03 17:50:28 |
| Message-ID: | 35edc9ea-9584-3f27-f230-2dd5389df88d@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/1/17 22:40, Robert Haas wrote:
> That seems like it is at least arguably a wire protocol break. Today,
> if you send a string containing only one command, you will only get
> one answer.
The wire protocol already supports this. And the wire protocol doesn't
really know about statements, only about a command string that might
contain multiple commands. So I don't think anything would break.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-03 17:54:30 | Re: Add some const decorations to prototypes |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-11-03 17:48:20 | Re: Dynamic result sets from procedures |