Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Gregory Brail <gregbrail(at)google(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Hernandez <aht(at)ongres(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
Date: 2017-09-25 17:26:20
Message-ID: 35ddc2bc-580d-dad0-76bd-83c4df946691@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/25/2017 10:15 AM, Gregory Brail wrote:
> Yes. I'm advocating something "built-in" to Postgres. Any or all of
> those are likely a great starting point.

I don't see a benefit to having this "in postgres". The whole reason we
have built out a mature and extensible product is so that not everything
needs to be in postgres. We instead have a huge landscape of extensions
created by our community that we don't have to manage in core.

Thanks,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-25 17:26:42 Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-09-25 17:23:57 Re: logical replication and statistics