Re: Logical Implication

From: "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
To: "Vik Fearing" <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, "Nathan Bossart" <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zsolt Parragi" <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, "Jacob Champion" <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Isaac Morland" <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logical Implication
Date: 2026-11-07 18:18:43
Message-ID: 35d2652e-c40b-40f2-b44c-af09a98f8c34@app.fastmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 3, 2026, at 18:18, Vik Fearing wrote:
> Attached is a new patch set that makes IMPLIES non-associative, changes

+1 to non-associative

/Joel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Yen 2026-11-07 18:56:56 [PATCH] Clarify CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS output for invalid indexes
Previous Message Lucas Jeffrey 2026-11-07 18:11:49 Postgres fdw: Bug in InitPgFdwOptions initialization can cause an esoteric crash