Re: [HACKERS] more on int8

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more on int8
Date: 1998-09-11 05:15:11
Message-ID: 35F8B1DF.3EF32011@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > I tried the int8 type under BSD/OS, running 6.3.2 (contrib/int8).
> > > There the %Ld type is unimplemented and %lld or %qd both work.
> I am running BSD/OS here, and configure recoginizes it with %qd.

Just out of curiosity, does Bruce's BSDI system recognize %lld as did
Daniel's? If so, we could dispense with the %qd option for the final
release...

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-09-11 06:14:28 Re: [HACKERS] more on int8
Previous Message Midwest Online 1998-09-11 05:11:17 getting "fe_setauthsvc: invalid name" error