Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] iodbc interface on Unix

From: Gerald Gryschuk <ggryschuk(at)scf(dot)sk(dot)ca>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Byron Nikolaidis <byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com>, Postgres Interfaces Mailing List <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] iodbc interface on Unix
Date: 1998-08-25 21:52:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> So, I just finished removing the stubs and internal calls which I had
> added in (having now found the linker options which make sure things
> resolve within the library), when I found some additional stubs which
> are in results.c. They have been there since before I touched the code.
> Are they required for Windows? If so, why aren't the other routines
> required to be stubbed as they were on my Unix box without the right
> linker options??

With the "-Bsymbolic" flag(which I found only after you mentioned it)
than none of
these _SQL stubs are needed. Byron only added the _SQL stubs when I told
him that
there was a problem that I thought was related to an ODBC spec issue
which was really
just this problem all along. In other words my ignorance led me to a
mistaken conclusion, which we have attempted to fix in the wrong way
ever since. I really must apologize.

So I'm positive its o.k. if you dust all references to _SQL functions.

Gerald Gryschuk(ggryschuk(at)scf(dot)sk(dot)ca)
Programmer Analyst
Saskatoon Cancer Centre

In response to


pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Leslie MikesellDate: 1998-08-25 21:55:41
Subject: excel vs. money data type?
Previous:From: Brendan RempelDate: 1998-08-25 18:25:18
Subject: pThread and libpq problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group