| From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "Dr(dot) Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)online-club(dot)de> | 
| Cc: | "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Dropping tables... | 
| Date: | 1998-08-03 05:58:51 | 
| Message-ID: | 35C5519B.CF305216@krs.ru | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Thanks again, Michael!
> > 1. In session T1 run
> >
> >    LOCK TABLE test IN EXCLUSIVE MODE;
> >
> > 2. In session T2 run
> >
> >    UPDATE test SET y = 0 WHERE x = 0;
> >
> >    -- shouldn't be blocked by T1 if ROW EXCLUSIVE
> >    -- lock is acquired by T2 only when row found
> 
> But it indeed is blocked.
Ok, I misunderstood Oracle documentation..
Blocking means that T2 acquires ROW EXCLUSIVE table lock
_before_ statement execution.
> 
> > 3. Now again in session T1
> >
> >    DROP TABLE test;
> >
> >    -- will be this blocked ?
> 
> DROP TABLE test
>            *
> ERROR at line 1:
> ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
> 
> However, after this, the update call is executed. After a commit in T2, test
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
DROP TABLE commits transaction and releases EXCLUSIVE table lock...
> can be dropped.
No matter was table _really_ modified or not, T2 holds ROW EXCLUSIVE
table lock untill COMMIT/ABORT.
Well...
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-03 06:02:52 | Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes | 
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-03 05:58:02 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: make pg_shadow updates more robust |