| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix domain fast defaults on empty tables |
| Date: | 2026-06-05 14:08:29 |
| Message-ID: | 3590551.1780668509@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 5 June 2026 10:48:00 EEST, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> evantest=# create domain d_div as int check (1 / (value - 1) > 0);
>> CREATE DOMAIN
>> evantest=# create table t (a int);
>> CREATE TABLE
>> evantest=# alter table t add column b d_div default 1;
>> ERROR: division by zero
> It seems totally reasonable to get an error in that case. '1' is not a valid value for the datatype, whether or not there are any rows in the table.
I think there's reason for concern here, which is that we do not throw
an error for the apparently equivalent case
regression=# create table t2 (a int, b d_div default 1);
CREATE TABLE
This will give you an error at INSERT, but not CREATE. So this
is inconsistent, as well as different from the pre-v19 behavior.
Concretely, I'm pretty sure it is a hazard for pg_dump, which thinks
it can freely transform bits of CREATE operations into ALTERs.
I didn't try to make an example case, but I suspect it is now possible
to create a database that will fail dump/restore because of this
inconsistency.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-06-05 14:28:44 | Re: Prevent remote libpq notices from being sent to clients |
| Previous Message | Ilmar Yunusov | 2026-06-05 14:07:53 | Re: Remove inner joins based on foreign keys |