Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date: 2001-07-20 15:29:28
Message-ID: 3585.995642968@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> What about moving the oid column out of the tuple header. This saves 4
> bytes in the header in cases where there is no oid on the table.

No it doesn't --- at least not on machines where MAXALIGN is eight
bytes.

I don't think this is worth the trouble...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-20 15:35:12 Re: Large queries - again...
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-07-20 15:26:59 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)