| From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] performance tests, initial results |
| Date: | 1998-06-15 01:09:18 |
| Message-ID: | 3584743E.2A005766@krs.ru |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
First, thanks for fixing runtests.pl, David (I'm not so cool perl
programmer as I would like to be -:)
> - Assertion checking seems to cost about 7% except for create index where
> it costs 90%
Wow! This should be discovered!
> - Something is very wrong with our buffer cache implementation. Going from
> 256 buffers to 2048 buffers costs an average of 25%. In the 8K txn case
> it costs about 70%. I see looking at the code and profiling that in the 8K
> txn case this is in BufferSync() which examines all the buffers at commit
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> time. I don't quite understand why it is so costly for the single 8K row
> txn (35%) though.
This one is in my plans for 1 - 1.5 year :)
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vassilis Papadimos | 1998-06-15 10:11:22 | subscribe |
| Previous Message | David Gould | 1998-06-14 22:35:13 | performance tests, initial results |