Re: do coverage test without install lcov

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: do coverage test without install lcov
Date: 2021-02-22 15:45:21
Message-ID: 3583753.1614008721@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> writes:
> Because it's a little difficult to install lcov in offline environment and we can get a
> text format result by running make coverage. How about change this action, when
> there is no lcov in system, only a warning message is reported.

> The patch attached. Thought ?

This should use the "missing" mechanism that's already used for,
e.g., flex and bison.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-02-22 15:52:42 Re: computing dT from an interval
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2021-02-22 15:01:41 Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol