| From: | Hannu <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Byron Nikolaidis <byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com>, interfaces postgres <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs |
| Date: | 1998-06-12 07:45:38 |
| Message-ID: | 3580DCA2.6ED9826E@trust.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces pgsql-sql |
Byron Nikolaidis wrote:
>
> Hi,
...
>
> I have tested other types besides timestamps, like int4, and they seem
> to work fine as a versioning column. So, we could use the postgres
> 'xmin' column, if we displayed it in SQLColumns. It seems to always
> update so you wouldn't have to worry about a trigger. I'm not sure what
> end-users would think about seeing these ugly columns in Access? Any
> thoughts about that?
Is'nt there some way in ODBC to return some kind of _system_ columns,
like there are system tables ?
I think that PostgreSQL is not the only database that has system columns
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jose' Soares Da Silva | 1998-06-12 10:18:01 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs |
| Previous Message | Matthew | 1998-06-11 21:56:30 | crypt compile problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yingpling Lu | 1998-06-12 08:30:53 | how to bulky-copy data in postgreSql |
| Previous Message | Byron Nikolaidis | 1998-06-11 21:36:03 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs |