| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? |
| Date: | 2023-01-18 15:38:35 |
| Message-ID: | 3573850.1674056315@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... I was going for the html effect
> of having these views chunked into their own pages, any other changes being
> non-detrimental.
But is that a result we want? It will for example break any bookmarks
that people might have for these documentation entries. It will also
pretty thoroughly break the cross-version navigation links in this
part of the docs.
Maybe the benefit is worth those costs, but I'm entirely not convinced
of that. I think we need to tread pretty lightly when rearranging
longstanding documentation-layout decisions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-18 15:46:24 | Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-18 15:33:27 | Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client |