Re: AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON

From: "Gran Thyni" <goran(at)bildbasen(dot)se>
To: Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON
Date: 1998-05-14 15:25:10
Message-ID: 355B0CD6.58F3CF3B@bildbasen.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Zeugswetter wrote:
>
> >> - Could we use mmap:ing of files at a higher level then
> >> src/backend/strorage/ipc/ipc.c to get even better performance
> >> and cleaness?
> >
> >Yes, we could use mmap() to map the actual files. I will post time
> >timings on this soon.
>
> I do not think this will be a practicable solution, since it would mean the whole db
> has to mmap'ed. This means there has to be enough virtual memory to hold
> the complete database, or at least one table at a time. Or do I understand this wrong ??

Why would we map the whole database or even a whole table?
You can map the section of a file you are interested in.

# man mmap

Besides a sensible memory manager does not actually map the pages
until they are access, unfort. not all OSes are sensible.

--
---------------------------------------------
Göran Thyni, sysadm, JMS Bildbasen, Kiruna

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-05-14 15:27:18 Re: [HACKERS] char(8) vs char8
Previous Message Andreas Zeugswetter 1998-05-14 14:58:50 AW: [HACKERS] char(8) vs char8