Re: [HACKERS] Automatic type conversion

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Maurice Gittens <mgittens(at)gits(dot)nl>
Cc: Dave Chapeskie <dchapes(at)ddm(dot)on(dot)ca>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Automatic type conversion
Date: 1998-05-11 14:47:09
Message-ID: 35570F6D.ED2CD34B@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Don't worry I'll shut up now.

Well, try things out if you have time and see if things work in general.
It took me quite some time to work through the issues and we'll need to
try many cases and have some back-and-forth discussion before everything
is clear and we can determine what adjustments should be made.

fyi, the original SQL developers for Postgres seemed to be divided on
the subject, but one camp concluded that almost no automatic type
conversion was desirable. I think in practice that this is too extreme,
since many cases have an obvious best conversion strategy...

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-05-11 14:49:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-05-11 14:42:41 Re: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON