Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] BSDI-3.1

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] BSDI-3.1
Date: 1998-04-23 15:41:24
Message-ID: 353F6124.BD079930@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Hackers, is the gram.c file not new enough in the 6.3.2 tarball?
>
> Apparently not: I note that my recompile rebuilt it too. (Fortunately
> I have bison installed.) tar says
>
> $ tar tvfz ~postgres/archive/postgresql-6.3.2.tar.gz | grep /gram
> -rw-r--r-- pgsql/wheel 398333 1998-04-17 03:00 postgresql-6.3.2/src/backend/parser/gram.c
> -rw-r--r-- pgsql/wheel 126012 1998-04-17 03:00 postgresql-6.3.2/src/backend/parser/gram.y

Bruce, what I usually try to do (but sometimes forget) is to commit the
two files separately, doing a "touch" on gram.c after committing gram.y
and before committing gram.c. That way, there is a significant time
difference between the two files.

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-04-23 15:58:39 HP-UX porting strategy (moved from PATCHES)
Previous Message Darren King 1998-04-23 15:24:30 Removing PORTNAME from libpq/Makefile