Re: Patch to add support of "IF NOT EXISTS" to others "CREATE" statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to add support of "IF NOT EXISTS" to others "CREATE" statements
Date: 2014-03-01 17:11:18
Message-ID: 3538.1393693878@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> Fabrzio, can you clarify the use-case for things like CREATE AGGREGATE
>> to have IF NOT EXISTS rather than OR REPLACE, or if there is a reason
>> why both should exist? Complicating our CREATE options is not something
>> we really wish to do without good reason and we certainly don't want to
>> add something now that we'll wish to remove in another version or two.

> Well I have a scenario with many servers to deploy DDL scripts, and most of
> them we must run without transaction control because some tasks like CREATE
> INDEX CONCURRENTLY, DROP/CREATE DATABASE, CLUSTER, etc.

> When an error occurs the script stops, but the previous commands was
> commited, then we must review the script to comment parts that was already
> executed and then run it again. Until now is not a really trouble, but in
> some cases we must deploy another DDL script that contains a new version of
> some object before we finish to fix the previous version that was in
> production, and if we have CINE for all CREATE objects this task will more
> easy because we just run it again without care if will replace the content
> and do not produce an error.

Why wouldn't COR semantics answer that requirement just as well, if not
better?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-03-01 17:29:38 Re: Securing "make check" (CVE-2014-0067)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-03-01 17:01:37 commit fest status and release timeline