| From: | Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | radhika(at)88thstreet(dot)com, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Temp tbl Vs. View |
| Date: | 2007-03-29 15:46:12 |
| Message-ID: | 353111.48354.qm@web31815.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> select from the view is taking a lot of time (7000 ms) as per explain
> analyze. Both the primary and secondary tables have about 400,000 rows.
>
> My question is how can I fix this?
> Would it be better to create a temporary table for just daily data and
> have the view for more extended queries? Any other design ideas?
Perhaps tsearch2 would work for you. I am just starting to learn about it. Maybe you can create
a tsearch2 GIN index on each table in the view, and then use tsearch2 queries to quickly retrieve
your results.
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rodrigo De León | 2007-03-29 15:56:33 | Re: Temp tbl Vs. View |
| Previous Message | Radhika Sambamurti | 2007-03-29 15:26:25 | Temp tbl Vs. View |