| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql: Could we get "-- " prefixing on the **** QUERY **** outputs? (ECHO_HIDDEN) |
| Date: | 2023-05-17 18:13:30 |
| Message-ID: | 3509103.1684347210@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> You removed the ******** QUERY ******** at the end of the query.
> I think we should keep that (as comments, of course). People
> are used to the current output, and it is nice to have a clear
> visual marker at the end of what isn't normally part of "psql"
> output.
I agree. These considerations of what shows up in the readline
log if you choose to copy-and-paste seem far secondary to the
readability of the terminal output in the first place.
Also, you'd have to avoid copying-and-pasting the query output
anyway, so I'm not entirely sold that there's much of
a usability gain here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tristen Raab | 2023-05-17 18:37:49 | Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen |
| Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2023-05-17 17:46:35 | Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context? |