Re: Is "WIN32" #defined in Cygwin builds?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is "WIN32" #defined in Cygwin builds?
Date: 2015-08-31 18:58:31
Message-ID: 3502.1441047511@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 08/31/2015 02:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I started wondering about $subject because we are fairly schizophrenic
>> about whether we believe this.

> No, and we've made sure not to do that ourselves, or at least I hope we
> have.

OK, thanks. I was wondering whether I'd broken the Cygwin build with
a65e0864, but it should be okay.

Not sure if it's worth trying to clean up the #if tests that are redundant
given this knowledge. It looks like there's about a dozen.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-08-31 18:59:47 Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-31 18:52:05 Anybody have icc for IA64?