Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Date: 2021-10-14 22:19:45
Message-ID: 34e972bc-6e75-0754-9e6d-cde2518773a1@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 10/13/21 7:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 10/13/21 5:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2021-10-13 16:06:32 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> If you prep a patch I'll test it.
>> Well, right now I'm wondering if the better fix is to just remove the whole
>> win32 block. I don't know how far back, but afaict it's not needed. Seems to
>> have been needed for narwhal at some point, according to 02b61dd08f99. But
>> narwhal is long dead.
>>
> Ok, I'll test it out.
>

confirmed that jacana doesn't need this code to build or test plperl
(all I did was change the test from win32 to win32x). There would still
be work to do to fix the contrib bool_plperl, jsonb_plperl and
hstore_plperl modules.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-10-14 22:23:00 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-10-14 22:10:36 Re: relation OID in ReorderBufferToastReplace error message