Re: sgml and "empty" closing tags

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sgml and "empty" closing tags
Date: 2009-11-17 03:54:45
Message-ID: 34d269d40911161954h23640b7cxa30dde5c82b18899@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 20:41, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Apparently --- it's perfectly legal in SGML.  (I think not in XML.)

Cool. Thanks!

BTW anyone know how to escape < and > for google? I tried searching
for it-- but ran into a chick and egg situation. So the I tried
various forms of "google search left angle bracket", quotes,
backslashes and "+". no luck

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-11-17 04:21:21 Re: Raising the geqo_threshold default
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-11-17 03:44:49 Re: sgml and "empty" closing tags