From: | "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org> |
Cc: | mrogan(at)fpelectronics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, stanb(at)awod(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] sequences |
Date: | 1998-03-02 03:31:03 |
Message-ID: | 34FA27F7.AB28F3D0@sable.krasnoyarsk.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Brett McCormick wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 February 1998, at 10:27:07, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> > Michael J. Rogan wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > But we could return PRIMARY KEY of affected tuple if it exists!
> > > > I kept this feature in mind when thought about removing OID...
> > > >
> > > > Comments ?
> > >
> > > This would be very useful. I never did like the idea of using OID as
> > > reference so a way to get the PIMARY KEY would be A GOOD THING(tm).
> >
> > But we will have to decide how to deal with multi-key PK...
> >
> > Vadim
>
> How is this implemented?
Using multi-key unique btree indices.
Vadim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-03-02 04:01:43 | Re: [HACKERS] SunOS patches |
Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-03-02 03:23:51 | Re: [HACKERS] SunOS patches |