| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ? |
| Date: | 2002-06-11 19:27:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3494.1023823642@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> As a related side note. The other part of the original patch (the NOT
> EXISTS in the upd/del no action trigger) was rejected. For match
> full and match unspecified the same result can be reached by doing another
> query which may be better than the subquery. Do you think that'd be
> better?
No opinion offhand; can you show examples of the alternatives you have
in mind?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Victor Wagner | 2002-06-11 20:13:11 | Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ? |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-06-11 19:05:42 | Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Victor Wagner | 2002-06-11 20:13:11 | Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ? |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-06-11 19:05:42 | Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ? |