Russell Foster <russell(dot)foster(dot)coding(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I understand your concerns overall, and the solution you propose seems
> reasonable. But are we just using "windows-group" because the code is not
> there today to check for a user in another OS group?
It's not clear to me whether Windows groups have exact equivalents in
other OSes. If we think the concept is generic, I'd be okay with
spelling the keyword system-group or the like. The patch you
proposed looked pretty Windows-specific though. Somebody with more
SSPI knowledge than me would have to opine on whether "sspi-group"
is a reasonable name.
regards, tom lane